![]() The whole discussion of phone games reminded me that more and more developers are porting/revamping older games for mobile devices, and some of them aren't busted like the Chrono Trigger PC port. However, it was released for $20(?) to PC and PS4 by a smaller company. If Rocket League had been a console only release in 2012, I'm certain it would have cost $60. I think PC players (myself included) are willing to bite the bullet by spending $30 on a full title that we may play since we are so conditioned on the value of a launch title being $60. Sometimes it's really steep discounts like 20% off + all DLC only 6 months after release. PC players are used to discounts and smaller titles. You might be able to grab a title that's $40 on release, but that's rare. If you're primarily a console player, your games are almost always $60USD. I also think the massive Steam library is a symptom of the console market. Very easy game to get into with movesets that aren't complicated and short matches, but it's a tough game to master when you factor in combos, frame data, reading opponents, learning character match ups, etc. I recently picked up Street Fighter 5 and borrowed an arcade stick from a friend who played competitively. But at the end, I find myself getting tired or bored. I always convinced myself that casual games allow for quick picking up and putting down just in case something comes up. I also find myself going back to these heavier games time after time. ![]() I'm not saying anything about the quality of Ironsource as a network, but lets not make them out to be the boogeyman. S/yet another spam app with spam bundle-ware/a mobile application utilizing advertisements/ > And this is just another article trying to convince app developers to make yet another spam app with spam bundle-ware You're frustrated at specific advertisements on an advertisement network/the security of the network as a whole. They don't have a "spam-bundleware-crapware-search-bar". ![]() > They try to put their spam-bundleware-crapware-search-bar into everything. > This is just a spam piece from the spam company ironsource. This is a clear failure on Ironsource's part to secure their network, but it isn't evidence of any malitious intent on their part. > That’s not to say that IronSource is necessarily aware that a publisher (pay-per-install) is redirecting visitors to sites that impersonate Google Chrome. > IronSource is likely to blame third party "partners" for most or all of the defects we have listed, but our analysis indicates that IronSource is importantly responsible. What you're angry at (and rightly so) is the fact that their network was used to offer malware/adware. Ironsource is an advertisement/UA company that doesn't offer any "toolbar".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |